Method and apparatus for calibrating a digitally controlled oscillator

ABSTRACT

A method of calibrating a digitally controlled oscillator (DCO). The method comprises configuring a fine tuning capacitive component of the DCO into a minimum capacitance configuration therefor, configuring a coarse tuning capacitive component of the DCO into a first configuration therefor and determining a resulting first output frequency of the DCO. The method further comprises configuring the coarse tuning capacitive component into a second configuration therefor, the second and first configurations of the coarse tuning capacitive component being capacitively increasing consecutive configurations respectively, configuring the fine tuning capacitive component into a maximum capacitance configuration therefor, determining control signal settings for a resolution adjustment component of the DCO that achieve a resulting output frequency of the DCO equal to the determined first output frequency, and generating calibration data for the second configuration of the coarse tuning capacitive component comprising the determined control signal settings for the resolution adjustment component.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method and apparatus for calibrating adigitally controlled oscillator.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In many applications, a digital synthesizer is implemented by way of adigital phase locked loop (DPLL) that is used to control a digitallycontrolled oscillator (DCO) to generate (synthesize) an output frequencysignal. Such digital synthesizers provide the benefit of simplifying theintegration of the synthesizer circuity within large scale integrateddigital circuit devices, as compared with equivalent analoguesynthesizers, thereby reducing size, costs, power consumption and designcomplexity. Furthermore, DPLLs intrinsically present lower phase noisethan their analogue counterparts.

In applications such as automotive radar systems, phase noise introducedinto the output frequency signal by the synthesizer is critical. In thecase of radar systems, the phase noise dictates the system's ability todistinguish between small and large targets (i.e. the dynamic range ofthe radar system). Accordingly, for such applications it is important tominimize the phase noise introduced by the digital synthesizers (e.g.DPLLs), and specifically their DCOs, as well as to linearize the FMCW(frequency modulated continuous wave) ramp in the case of a FMCW system.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method of calibrating a digitallycontrolled oscillator, a digital synthesizer comprising a digitallycontrolled oscillator and a digitally controlled oscillator as describedin the accompanying claims.

Specific embodiments of the invention are set forth in the dependentclaims.

These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from andelucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further details, aspects and embodiments of the invention will bedescribed, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings. Inthe drawings, like reference numbers are used to identify like orfunctionally similar elements. Elements in the figures are illustratedfor simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale.

FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional digital phase locked loop.

FIG. 2 illustrates a simplified circuit diagram of a digitallycontrolled oscillator.

FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified circuit diagram of a conventionaldigitally controlled variable capacitance component of a digitallycontrolled oscillator.

FIG. 4 illustrates an ideal relationship between the configuration ofcapacitive banks of the digitally controlled oscillator of FIG. 3 andthe resulting output frequency of the digitally controlled oscillator.

FIG. 5 illustrates a scenario in which the tuneable ranges of a finetuning capacitive network of the digitally controlled oscillator of FIG.3 for consecutive coarse tuning capacitive configurations do not align.

FIG. 6 illustrates a conventional technique for compensating for PVTvariations etc. within the digitally controlled oscillator of FIG. 3.

FIG. 7 illustrates a simplified example of a proposed technique forcalibrating tuneable ranges of a fine tuning capacitance within adigitally controlled oscillator.

FIG. 8 illustrates a simplified block diagram of an example of a digitalsynthesizer.

FIG. 9 illustrates a simplified circuit diagram of a digitallycontrolled variable capacitance component of a digitally controlledoscillator.

FIG. 10 illustrates a simplified flowchart of an example of a method ofcalibrating a digitally controlled oscillator.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of configuration data obtained within afirst part of the method of FIG. 10.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of configuration data obtained within asecond part of the method of FIG. 10.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of the configuration data obtained andstored within the method of FIG. 10.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a template for a lookup table that isgenerated from the configuration data in FIG. 13.

FIG. 15 illustrates a simplified flowchart of an example of a method ofdecoding a digital control word for controlling a digitally controlledoscillator.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In accordance with some example embodiments of the present invention,there is provided a method of calibrating a digitally controlledoscillator (DCO). More specifically, during calibration of the DCO, itis proposed to calibrate, for each coarse tuning capacitiveconfiguration, a resolution adjustment component of the fine tuningcapacitive component of the DCO such that the fine tuneable ranges forconsecutive coarse tuning capacitive bank configurations are aligned.

Advantageously, such a calibration process allows PVT variations etc. tobe compensated for without the need for relying on error margins thatwaste control signals/codes for the fine tuning capacitive component. Inparticular, following such a calibration process, the full fine tuneablerange of the DCO is used, and no control signals/codes are wasted onerror margins. Consequently, the smallest achievable DCO LSB tuneablefrequency step can be realized, and thus the minimum achievablefrequency resolution of the DCO can be realized. In this manner, thequantization noise introduced by the DCO may be minimized, therebyimproving the phase noise performance of a DPLL of which the DCO forms apart. Furthermore, fine tuning capacitive component transitions can bealigned between consecutive coarse tuning capacitive bankconfigurations, thereby improving the linearity of the transitionsbetween the coarse tuning capacitive bank configurations.

FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional digital phase locked loop (DPLL) 100.An N-bit digital frequency control word 105 is provided to a phasecomparator 110, which compares an N-bit digital feedback signal 155 tothe frequency control word 105, and outputs an N-bit oscillator controlsignal 115 based on the comparison of the digital feedback signal 155 tothe frequency control word 105. A digital low pass filter 120 filtersthe oscillator control signal 115, and outputs a filtered N-bitoscillator control signal 125, which is provided to a digitallycontrolled oscillator (DCO) 130. The DCO 130 outputs a frequency signal135 based on the filtered oscillator control signal 125. A feedback pathof the DPLL 100 consists of a divider 140 that divides the outputfrequency signal 135 to generate a frequency-divided signal 145, whichis provided to a time to digital converter 150. The time to digitalconverter 150 also receives a reference frequency signal 165 used tosample the frequency-divided signal 145. The time to digital converter150 outputs the digital feedback signal 155 based on a measured timeinterval between the frequency-divided signal 145 and the referencefrequency signal 165.

The phase noise introduced by the DPLL 100 of FIG. 1 is primarily due tothe digital-to-analogue conversion performed by the DCO 130, andtime-to-digital conversion performed by the time to digital converter150 in the feedback path. In particular, the minimum frequencyresolution of the DCO 130 dictates the phase noise performance of theDPLL 100, since it introduces quantization noise on top of the intrinsicDCO noise performance. The minimum DCO frequency resolution (f_(res)) isselectable during the design phase of the DPLL, and represents the DCOLSB (least significant bit) tuneable frequency step (i.e. thegranularity of the tuning capacitance codeword).

FIG. 2 illustrates a simplified circuit diagram of a typical DCO 130.The DCO 130 includes an LC (inductance-capacitance) tank circuit 210arranged to oscillate a current at a resonant frequency of the LC tankcircuit 210. As is typical with such LC tank circuits, the LC tankcircuit 210 of FIG. 2 includes various passive elements in the form ofinductive and capacitive elements. For simplicity, the LC tank circuit210 of FIG. 2 is illustrated as comprising a variable capacitancecomponent 220 and inductive elements 230 coupled in parallel with thevariable capacitance component 220 between two tank nodes A and B.However, any suitable arrangement of inductive and capacitive elementsmay be provided within the LC tank circuit 210. The capacitiveproperties of the variable capacitance component 220 may be ‘tuned’ byway of the N-bit digital control signal 125, output by the digitallow-pass filter 120 in FIG. 1, and in this manner the resonant frequencyof the LC tank circuit 210 may be controlled.

FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified circuit diagram of a conventionaldigitally controlled variable capacitance component 220. The variablecapacitance component 220 consists of several capacitive banks coupledin parallel, between the tank nodes A and B, to provide the required DCOfrequency range and tuning resolution. In the implementation illustratedin FIG. 3, the variable capacitance component 220 includes a fine tuningcapacitive bank 310 and one or more coarse tuning capacitive banks,illustrated generally at 320.

A decoder 350 is arranged to receive and decode the N-bit oscillatorcontrol signal 125, and to output control signals 352, 354 to each ofthe capacitive banks 310, 320 in accordance with the decoded N-bitoscillator control signal 125. In the illustrated implementation of FIG.3, the decoder 350 outputs n+m control signals 352, 354; n of thecontrol signals 352 controlling capacitive elements (not illustrated)within the fine tuning capacitive bank 310; and m of the control signal354 controlling capacitive elements (not illustrated) within the coarsertuning capacitive bank(s) 320.

The fine tuning capacitive bank 310 is coupled in series with two seriescapacitances C_(s) 330. The fine tuning capacitance bank 310 is furthercoupled on either side thereof to a reference voltage (ground in theillustrated implementation) by two shunt capacitances 2C_(f) 340. Thefine tuning capacitive bank 310, series capacitances C_(s) 330 and shuntcapacitances 2C_(f) 340 together form a fine tuning capacitive network305 of the variable capacitance component 220. The capacitive changestep size (ΔC_(v)) of the fine tuning capacitive bank 310 defines theminimum frequency resolution for the DCO 130, and thus the quantizationnoise for the DCO 130. The capacitances C_(s) 330 and 2C_(f) 340 reducethe capacitive contribution of the fine tuning capacitance bank 310within the overall effective capacitance of the variable capacitancecomponent 220. Specifically, the equivalent capacitance C_(eq) of thefine tuning capacitive network 305 may be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix}{C_{eq} = \frac{C_{s}( {C_{v} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {C_{v} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1}\end{matrix}$

From Equation 1, it can be seen that a change in the capacitance ΔC_(v)of the fine tuning capacitance bank 310 results in a change in theequivalent capacitance ΔC_(eq) of:

$\begin{matrix}{{\Delta \; C_{eq}} = {\frac{C_{s}^{2}}{2( {C_{v} + C_{f} + C_{s}} )^{2}} \times \Delta \; C_{v}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 2}\end{matrix}$

In this manner, a finer minimum equivalent capacitive resolution(ΔC_(eq)) for the fine tuning capacitive network 305, and thus for thevariable capacitance component 220, may be achieved with thecapacitances C_(s) 330 and 2C_(f) 340 than would otherwise be directlyachievable through configuration of the fine tuning capacitive bank 310alone (i.e. that of ΔC_(v)).

FIG. 4 illustrates an ideal relationship between the configuration ofthe capacitive banks 310, 320 and the resulting output frequency of theDCO 130. Three consecutive coarse tuning capacitive bank configurationsare illustrated at C_(i−1) 410, C_(i) 412 and C_(i+1) 414 respectively.The tuneable range of the fine tuning capacitive network 305 for each ofthe coarse tuning capacitive bank configurations C_(i−1) 410, C_(i) 412and C_(i+1) 414 is illustrated at 420, 422 and 424 respectively. In anideal scenario, such as illustrated in FIG. 4, the tuneable ranges 420,422 and 424 of the fine tuning capacitive network 305 for consecutivecoarse tuning capacitive bank configurations are aligned. However, PVT(Process, voltage, temperature) variations etc. mean that it is notpossible to ensure such alignment of the tuneable ranges 420, 422 and424 of the fine tuning capacitive network 305 for consecutive coarsetuning capacitive bank configurations.

FIG. 5 illustrates a scenario in which the tuneable ranges 420, 422 and424 of the fine tuning capacitive network 305 for consecutive coarsetuning capacitive bank configurations do not align. In the scenarioillustrated in FIG. 5, the tuneable ranges 420, 422 and 424 of the finetuning capacitive network 305 are not aligned, and do not overlap. As aresult, gaps 510 occur within the achievable output frequency range ofthe DCO 130, resulting in an inability of the DCO 130 to generatecertain frequency signals.

FIG. 6 illustrates a conventional technique for compensating for PVTvariations etc. in order to ensure a continuous achievable outputfrequency range for the DCO 130. For the conventional technique, thetuneable ranges 420, 422 and 424 of the fine tuning capacitive network305 for consecutive coarse tuning capacitive bank configurations aredesigned to overlap by an error margin 610. In this manner, PVTvariations that would otherwise result in gaps occurring within theachievable output frequency range of the DCO 130 can be tolerated bybeing compensated for within the error margins 610.

However, in order to ensure a sufficiently high yield of fabricateddevices, the error margins 610 must be sufficient to compensate for(close to) worst-case PVT variations. Consequently, in the majority ofcases, the implemented error margins 610 will over-compensate. Thetuneable range of the fine tuning capacitive network 305 is controlledthrough a finite number (n in FIG. 3) of control signals/codes 352 thattune the fine tuning capacitive bank 310. In order to implement theerror margin 610, the tuneable range of the fine tuning capacitivenetwork 305 must be extended to include the error margin 610. As aresult, the finite number n of control signals/codes 352 available forcontrolling the tuneable range of the fine tuning capacitive network 305are required to cover an extended tuneable range that includes the errormargin 610, increasing the fine tuning capacitive change step size(ΔC_(eq)) of each control signal/code 352. Following calibration of theDCO 130, the error margin 610 part of the tuneable range of the finetuning capacitive bank 310 will be superfluous and will not be used. Asa result, the control signals/codes 352 that relate to the error margin610 part of the tuneable range of the fine tuning capacitive network 305will not be used, and effectively wasted.

As previously mentioned, the minimum frequency resolution of the DCO 130dictates the phase noise performance of the DPLL 100, since itintroduces quantization noise on top of the intrinsic DCO noiseperformance. The minimum DCO frequency resolution (f_(res)) isselectable during the design phase of the DPLL, and represents the DCOLSB (least significant bit) tuneable frequency step (i.e the fine tuningcapacitive change step size (ΔC_(eq)) However, by wasting controlsignals/codes 352 that relate to an error margin 610, and not using allof the tuneable range of the fine tuning capacitive bank 310 followingcalibration of the DCO 130, the smallest achievable DCO LSB tuneablefrequency step is not being realized, and thus the minimum achievablefrequency resolution of the DCO 130 is not being realized.

Furthermore, for frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW)applications, a linear (smooth) transition is important between coarsetuning capacitive bank configurations. However, in the conventionaltechnique illustrated in FIG. 6, even following calibration,misalignment of the fine tuning capacitive bank configurations candegrade the linearity of the transitions between the coarse tuningcapacitive bank configurations.

FIG. 7 illustrates a simplified example of a proposed technique forcalibrating tuneable ranges of a fine tuning capacitance within a DCO.Three consecutive coarse tuning capacitive bank configurations areillustrated at C_(i−1) 710, C_(i) 712 and C_(i+1) 714 respectively. Thetuneable range of a fine tuning capacitance for each of the coarsetuning capacitive bank configurations C_(i−1) 710, C_(i) 712 and C_(i+1)714 is illustrated at 720, 722 and 724 respectively. During calibrationof the DCO, it is proposed to calibrate, for each coarse tuningcapacitive bank configurations C_(i−1) 710, C_(i) 712 and C_(i+1) 714for which a capacitively increased configuration of the coarse tuningcapacitive component exists, the tuneable range of the fine tuningcapacitance such that the tuneable ranges 720, 722 and 724 of the finetuning capacitance for consecutive coarse tuning capacitive bankconfigurations are aligned.

Advantageously, such a calibration process allows PVT variations etc. tobe compensated for without the need for relying on error margins thatwaste control signals/codes for the fine tuning capacitive component. Inparticular, following such a calibration process, the full tuneablerange of the fine tuning capacitive component is be used, and no controlsignals/codes are wasted on error margins. Consequently, the smallestachievable DCO LSB tuneable frequency step can be realized, and thus theminimum achievable frequency resolution of the DCO can be realized. Inthis manner, the quantization noise introduced by the DCO may beminimized, thereby improving the phase noise performance of a DPLL ofwhich the DCO forms a part. Furthermore, fine tuning capacitivecomponent transitions can be aligned between consecutive coarse tuningcapacitive bank configurations, thereby improving the linearity of thetransitions between the coarse tuning capacitive bank configurations.

FIG. 8 illustrates a simplified block diagram of an example of a digitalsynthesizer, and more specifically a digital phase locked loop (DPLL)800. An N-bit digital frequency control word 805 is provided to a phasecomparator 810, which compares an N-bit digital feedback signal 855 tothe frequency control word 805, and outputs an N-bit oscillator controlsignal 815 based on the comparison of the digital feedback signal 855 tothe frequency control word 805. A digital low pass filter 820 filtersthe oscillator control signal 815, and outputs a filtered N-bitoscillator control signal 825, which is provided to a digitallycontrolled oscillator (DCO) 830. The DCO 830 outputs a frequency signal835 based on the filtered oscillator control signal 825. A feedback pathof the DPLL 800 consists of a divider 840 that divides the outputfrequency signal 835 to generate a frequency-divided signal 845, whichis provided to a time to digital converter 850. The time to digitalconverter 850 also receives a reference frequency signal 865 used tosample the frequency-divided signal 845. The time to digital converter850 outputs the digital feedback signal 855 based on the sampling of thefrequency-divided signal 845.

The digital synthesizer (DPLL) 800 of FIG. 8 further includes acalibration component 860 arranged to perform calibration of the DCO830. Specifically, and as described in greater detail below, during acalibration mode of the digital synthesizer 800 the calibrationcomponent 860 is arranged to perform the steps of:

-   -   (i) configuring a fine tuning capacitive component of the DCO        830 into a minimum capacitance configuration therefor;    -   (ii) configuring a coarse tuning capacitive component of the DCO        830 into a first configuration C_(i) therefor;    -   (iii) determining a resulting first output frequency f_(i,0) of        the DCO 830;    -   (iv) configuring the coarse tuning capacitive component into a        second configuration C_(i−1) therefor, the second and first        configurations of the coarse tuning capacitive component being        capacitively increasing consecutive configurations respectively;    -   (v) configuring the fine tuning capacitive component into a        maximum capacitance configuration C_(n) therefor;    -   (vi) determining control signal settings for a resolution        adjustment component of the DCO 830 that achieve a resulting        output frequency f_(i−1,n) of the DCO 830 equal to the        determined first output frequency f_(i,0); and    -   (vii) generating calibration data for the second configuration        C_(i−1) of the coarse tuning capacitive component comprising the        determined control signal settings for the resolution adjustment        component.

FIG. 9 illustrates a simplified circuit diagram of a digitallycontrolled variable capacitance component 900 of the DCO 830. Thevariable capacitance component 900 of the DCO 830 includes a fine tuningcapacitive component 910, illustrated generally as a variablecapacitance in FIG. 9, coupled between tank nodes A and B of the DCO830. In some examples, the fine tuning capacitive component 910 mayconsist of a capacitive bank made up of a plurality of capacitiveelements (not illustrated) coupled in parallel and individuallycontrollable in a binary manner, by way of digital control signals 952,such that each capacitive element provides a first capacitive value whenthe respective control signal 952 is set to a first logical level (e.g.‘0’) and a second capacitive value when the respective control signal952 is set to a second logical level (e.g. ‘1’). Each capacitive elementmay be implemented by way of, for example, a capacitor coupled in serieswith a switch (e.g. transistor) device, a varactor diode, a switchedvaractor or the like. In some examples, the capacitive elements of thefine tuning capacitive component 910 are matched such that they eachprovide substantially the same first and second capacitive values, withthe difference between the first and second capacitive values of theindividual capacitive elements defining the capacitive change step size(ΔC_(v)) for the fine tuning capacitive component 910.

The fine tuning capacitive component 910 is coupled in series with twoseries capacitances C_(s) 930. The fine tuning capacitive component 910is further coupled on either side thereof to a reference voltage (groundin the illustrated implementation) by two shunt capacitances 2C_(f) 940.The fine tuning capacitive component 910, series capacitances C_(s) 930and shunt capacitances 2C_(f) 940 together form a fine tuning capacitivenetwork 905 of the variable capacitance component 900.

The variable capacitance component 900 of the DCO 830 includes a coarsetuning capacitive component 920, illustrated generally as a variablecapacitance in FIG. 9, coupled between tank nodes A and B. In someexamples, the coarse tuning capacitive component 910 may consist of oneor more capacitive bank(s), such as described above in relation to thefine tuning capacitance component 910, and controllable by way ofcontrol signals 954.

The variable capacitance component 900 of the DCO 830 further includes aresolution adjustment component, controllable to adjust a tuneable rangeof the fine tuning capacitive network 905. In the example illustrated inFIG. 9, the resolution adjustment component is implemented by way of thetwo shunt capacitances 2C_(f) 940 being variable capacitance componentshaving variable capacitances controllable by way of control signals 956.

As mentioned above, it is proposed to calibrate the tuneable range ofthe fine tuning capacitance of the variable capacitance component 900such that the tuneable range of the fine tuning capacitance forconsecutive coarse tuning configurations are aligned. Such an alignmentmay be expressed as:

ΔC _(eq) =C _(eq) _(_) _(max) −C _(eq) _(_) _(min) =C _(coarse) _(_)_(step)  Equation 3

where C_(eq) is the equivalent capacitance of the fine tuning capacitivenetwork 905, ΔC_(eq) is the tuneable range of the fine tuning capacitivenetwork 905, C_(eq) _(_) _(max) is the maximum tuneable capacitive valueof the fine tuning capacitive network 905, C_(eq) _(_) _(min) is theminimum tuneable capacitive value of the fine tuning capacitive network905 and C_(coarse) _(_) _(step) is a single capacitive change step sizefor the coarse tuning capacitive component 920.

The equivalent capacitance C_(eq) of the fine tuning capacitive network905 may be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix}{C_{eq} = \frac{C_{s}( {C_{v} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {C_{v} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 4}\end{matrix}$

From Equation 4 we get:

$\begin{matrix}{C_{eq\_ max} = {\frac{C_{s}( {C_{v\_ max} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {C_{v\_ max} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}} = \frac{C_{s}( {{n*\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {{n*\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 5} \\{C_{eq\_ min} = {\frac{C_{s}( {C_{v\_ min} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {C_{v\_ min} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}} = \frac{C_{s}( {{\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {{\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 6}\end{matrix}$

where it is assumed that the fine tuning capacitance component 910 istuneable between a single capacitive change step value (ΔC_(v)) and ncapacitive change step sizes. Substituting Equations 5 and 6 intoEquation 3 gives:

$\begin{matrix}{{\frac{C_{s}( {{n*\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {{n*\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}} - \frac{C_{s}( {{\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )}{{2( {{\Delta \; C_{v}} + C_{f}} )} + C_{s}}} = C_{coarse\_ step}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 7}\end{matrix}$

In some examples, the individual capacitive elements used within thetuning capacitance component 910 may match (i.e. provide substantiallythe same first and second capacitive values as) the capacitive elementswithin the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 that define the singlecapacitive change step size C_(coarse) _(_) _(step) for the coarsetuning capacitive component 920. In such a scenario: C_(coarse) _(_)_(step)=ΔC_(v)=C_(unit). Equation 7 may be re-written to be expressed interms of the shunt capacitance value C_(f):

$\begin{matrix}{C_{f} = \frac{\begin{matrix}{{- ( {C_{unit} + {n.C_{unit}}} )} +} \\\sqrt{\begin{matrix}{( {C_{unit} + {n.C_{unit}} + C_{s}} ) + {C_{s}^{2}( {n - 2} )} -} \\{2{C_{unit}( {{2{nC}_{unit}} + C_{s} + {nC}_{s}} )}}\end{matrix}}\end{matrix}}{2}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 8}\end{matrix}$

From Equation 8, it can be seen that alignment of the tuneable range ofthe fine tuning capacitive network 905 to a single capacitive changestep size C_(unit) for the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 may beachieved by proper setting of the shunt capacitance value C_(f).

In the example illustrated in FIG. 9, a decoder 950 is arranged toreceive and decode the N-bit oscillator control signal 825, and tooutput n+m control signals 952, 954 to the capacitive components 910,920 in accordance with the decoded N-bit oscillator control signal 825;n of the control signals 952 controlling capacitive elements (notillustrated) within the fine tuning capacitive component 910; and m ofthe control signal 954 controlling capacitive elements (not illustrated)within the coarse tuning capacitive component 920. In the exampleillustrated in FIG. 9, the decoder 950 is further arranged to output thecontrols signals 956 for the resolution adjustment component consistingof the two shunt capacitances 2C_(f) 940. In the illustrated example,the decoder 950 is arranged to decode the N-bit oscillator controlsignal 825 using a lookup table 955, the lookup table 955 containingcontrol settings for the control signals 952, 954, 956 associated withdigital control codes defined by the N-bit oscillator control signal825.

Referring now to FIG. 10, there is illustrated a simplified flowchart1000 of an example of a method of calibrating a digitally controlledoscillator, for example as may be implemented within the calibrationcomponent 860 of the DPLL 800 illustrated in FIG. 8 for calibrating theDCO 830. The method starts at 1005 and moves on to 1010 where DCOcontrol signals (for example the control signals 952, 954, 956illustrated in FIG. 9) are initialised, which for the illustratedexample consists of setting the control signals to configure the finetuning capacitive component 910 and coarse tuning capacitive component920 into a minimum capacitance configuration, and configuring theresolution adjustment component into a default (e.g. centred)capacitance configuration. For example, and as illustrated in FIG. 8,the calibration component 860 may be arranged to decouple the DCO 830from the oscillator control signal 825 output by the low pass filter820, and to cause the decoder 950 to configure the respective settingsfor the control signals 952, 954, 956.

Referring back to FIG. 10, the resulting output frequency of the DCO 830is then measured, or otherwise determined at 1015, and the measuredoutput frequency is stored along with the DCO control signal settings at1020. For example, and as illustrated in FIG. 8, the calibrationcomponent 860 may be arranged to receive the output signal from the DCO830 and to measure or otherwise determine the frequency of the receivedDCO output signal. The measured output frequency and corresponding DCOcontrol signal settings are then stored within a memory element 865 ofthe calibration component 860.

Referring back to FIG. 10, it is then determined whether the coarsetuning capacitive component 920 of the DCO 830 is configured into amaximum capacitive configuration (C_(coarse)=m), at 1025. If the coarsetuning capacitive component 920 of the DCO 830 is not configured into amaximum capacitive configuration, the control signals 954 for the coarsetuning capacitive component 920 are reset to configure the coarse tuningcapacitive component 920 into the next capacitively increasingconsecutive configuration therefor, at 1030. The method then loops backto 1015, where the resulting output frequency of the DCO 830 ismeasured, or otherwise determined, and the measured output frequency isstored along with the respective DCO control signal settings at 1020. Inthis manner, the method loops until output frequency measurements havebeen obtained and stored for all configurations of the coarse tuningcapacitive component 920 with the fine tuning capacitive component 910configured into a minimum capacitance configuration.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of the configuration data obtained andstored within this first part of the method of FIG. 10. As illustratedin FIG. 11, for each configuration of the coarse tuning capacitivecomponent 920, such as the three consecutive coarse tuning capacitivebank configurations are illustrated at C_(i−1) 1110, C_(i) 1112 andC_(i+1) 1114, a respective output frequency measurement f_((i−1),0)1130, f_(i,0) 1132 and f_((i+1),0) 1134 the fine tuning capacitivecomponent 910 configured into a minimum capacitance configuration C₀ atthe lower ends of the respective tuneable ranges 1120, 1122 and 1124 ofthe fine tuning capacitive network 905.

Referring back to FIG. 10, once it is determined that the coarse tuningcapacitive component 920 of the DCO 830 is configured into a maximumcapacitive configuration (C_(coarse)=m), at 1025, the method moves on to1035 where the DCO control signals are re-initialised to configure thefine tuning capacitive component 910 into a maximum capacitanceconfiguration therefor, the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 intoa minimum capacitance configuration therefor. The method then moves onto 1040 where control signal settings for the resolution adjustmentcomponent of the DCO 830 (i.e. for control signals 956 in FIG. 9) thatachieve a resulting output frequency of the DCO 830 for the currentconfiguration of the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 with thefine tuning capacitive component 910 configured into a maximumcapacitance configuration therefor that is equal to a stored outputfrequency value for a capacitively increasing consecutive configurationof the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 with the fine tuningcapacitive component 910 configured into a maximum capacitanceconfiguration therefor. For example, such a determination of the controlsignal settings for the resolution adjustment component of the DCO 830may be obtained by way of ‘sweeping’ the control signal settings for theresolution adjustment component while measuring the output frequencyuntil the ‘target’ output frequency is achieved.

The determined control signal settings for the resolution adjustmentcomponent of the DCO 830 are then stored along with the fine and coarsetuning capacitive component control signal settings and respectiveoutput frequency at 1045. It is then determined whether the coarsetuning capacitive component 920 of the DCO 830 is configured into aone-from-maximum capacitive configuration (C_(coarse)=m−1), at 1050. Ifthe coarse tuning capacitive component 920 of the DCO 830 is notconfigured into a one-from-maximum capacitive configuration, the controlsignals 954 for the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 are reset toconfigure the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 into the nextcapacitively increasing consecutive configuration therefor, at 1055. Themethod then loops back to 1040, where control signal settings for theresolution adjustment component of the DCO 830 (i.e. for control signals956 in FIG. 9) for the current configuration of the coarse tuningcapacitive component 920 are determined. In this manner, the methodloops until control signal settings for the resolution adjustmentcomponent for all configurations (but the absolute maximum capacitiveconfiguration) of the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 aredetermined and stored.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of the configuration data obtained andstored within this second part of the method of FIG. 10. Taking thecoarse capacitive component configuration C_(i) 1112 as an example, withthe fine tuning capacitive component 910 configured into a maximumcapacitance configuration C_(n) at the higher end of the respectivetuneable range 1122 of the fine tuning capacitive network 905, thecontrol signal settings for the resolution adjustment component of theDCO 830 are ‘swept’ to find the control signal settings that cause theoutput frequency f_(i,n) for the current coarse and fine capacitivetuning configurations to be equal to the stored output frequencyf_((i+1),0) for the capacitively increasing consecutive configurationC_(i+1) of the coarse tuning capacitive component 920 with the finetuning capacitive component 910 configured into a maximum capacitanceconfiguration C₀. In this manner, the tuneable range 1122 of the finetuning capacitive network 905 for the coarse capacitive componentconfiguration C_(i) 1112 is adjusted (by way of the control signalsettings for the resolution adjustment component) to be aligned with thetuneable range 1124 of the fine tuning capacitive network 905 for thenext consecutive coarse capacitive component configuration C_(i+1) 1114.

By dynamically and individually adjusting the respective tuneable rangeof the fine tuning capacitive network 905 for each coarse tuningconfiguration in this manner, variations in PVT etc. can be compensatedfor to ensure accurate alignment of the tuneable range of the finetuning capacitive network 905 between coarse tuning configurations,without wasting control signals/codes for the fine tuning capacitivecomponent 910. As a result, the smallest achievable DCO LSB tuneablefrequency step can be realized, and thus the minimum achievablefrequency resolution of the DCO can be realized. In this manner, thequantization noise introduced by the DCO may be minimized, therebyimproving the phase noise performance of a DPLL of which the DCO forms apart. Furthermore, fine tuning capacitive component transitions can bealigned between consecutive coarse tuning capacitive bankconfigurations, thereby improving the linearity of the transitionsbetween the coarse tuning capacitive bank configurations.

Referring back to FIG. 10, once it is determined that the coarse tuningcapacitive component 920 of the DCO 830 is configured into aone-from-maximum capacitive configuration (C_(coarse)=m), at 1050, themethod moves on to 1060 where calibration data for the DCO 830 isgenerated and stored, which in the example illustrated in FIG. 10consists of generating the lookup table 955 for the decoder 950. Forexample, FIG. 13 illustrates an example of the configuration data 1300obtained and stored previously within the method of FIG. 10. The dataindicated at 1310 consists of the configuration data obtained and storedwithin the first part of the method of FIG. 10 (1010-1030), whilst thedata indicated at 1320 consists of the configuration data obtained andstored within the second part of the method of FIG. 10 (1035-1055). Inthe example illustrated in FIG. 13, the previously obtained dataconsists of control signal settings 1330 for the coarse capacitivetuning component 920, control signal settings 1340 for the finecapacitive tuning component 910, control signal settings 1350 for theresolution adjustment component of the DCO 830 and a respective outputfrequency 1360 of the DCO 830.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a template for the lookup table 955that is generated from the configuration data 1300 in FIG. 13. A firstcolumn contains the digital control words for controlling/tuning the DCO830. Each digital control word 1410 is directly mapped to specificcontrol signal settings 1420, 1430 for the fine and coarse tuningcapacitive components 910, 920 of the DCO 830 respectively.

The resolution adjustment control signal settings 1440 are defined bythe configuration data indicated 1320 for the respective coarsecapacitance component control signal settings 1430 obtained and storedduring the second part of the method of FIG. 10. The resulting outputfrequencies 1450 for the DCO 830 for the maximum and minimum fine tuningcapacitive component configurations C₀, Cn for each coarse tuningcapacitive component configuration C_(i) are defined within thepreviously obtained configuration data 1300. The resulting outputfrequencies for the DCO 830 for the intermediate fine tuning capacitivecomponent configurations (C₁ to C_((n−1))) for each coarse tuningcapacitive component configuration C_(i) may be determined by way of,for example, interpolation based on the output frequencies 1450 for themaximum and minimum fine tuning capacitive component configurations C₀,Cn, or by actually measuring the individual output frequencies 1450 forthe DCO 830 for each individual control signal configuration.

Referring now to FIG. 15, there is illustrated a simplified flowchart1500 of an example of a method of decoding a digital control word forcontrolling a digitally controlled oscillator, such as may beimplemented within the decoder 950 of the DCO 830 illustrated in FIG. 9.The method starts at 1510, and moves on to 1502 where a digital controlword, for example the N-bit oscillator control signal 825 illustrated inFIGS. 8 and 9, for controlling a digitally controlled oscillator 830 isreceived. Control signal settings corresponding to the received digitalcontrol word are then determined at 1530, which in the illustratedexample consists of reading a lookup table for the received controlword. The determined control signal settings consist of:

-   -   control signal settings for a first set of control signals for        configuring a coarse tuning capacitive component (e.g. the        control signals 954 for the coarse tuning capacitive component        920 of FIG. 9);    -   control signal settings for a second set of control signals for        configuring a fine tuning capacitive component (e.g. the control        signals 952 for the fine tuning capacitive component 910 of FIG.        9); and    -   control signal settings for a third set of control signals for        configuring resolution adjustment component (e.g. the control        signals 956 for the variable shunt capacitive components 940 of        FIG. 9).

Having determined the control signal settings corresponding to thereceived digital control word, the determined control signal settingsare then applied to the respective control signals to configure thevariable capacitance component of the DCO, which in the illustratedexample consists of applying the third set of control signals toconfigure the resolution adjustment component at 1540 to configure thefine tuning range for the DCO, applying the second set of controlsignals at 1550 to configure the fine capacitive component, and applyingthe first set of control signals at 1560 to configure the coarsecapacitive component. The method then ends at 1570.

In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described withreference to specific examples of embodiments of the invention. It will,however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be madetherein without departing from the scope of the invention as set forthin the appended claims and that the claims are not limited to thespecific examples described above.

Furthermore, because the illustrated embodiments of the presentinvention may for the most part, be implemented using electroniccomponents and circuits known to those skilled in the art, details willnot be explained in any greater extent than that considered necessary asillustrated above, for the understanding and appreciation of theunderlying concepts of the present invention and in order not toobfuscate or distract from the teachings of the present invention.

The connections as discussed herein may be any type of connectionsuitable to transfer signals from or to the respective nodes, units ordevices, for example via intermediate devices. Accordingly, unlessimplied or stated otherwise, the connections may for example be directconnections or indirect connections. The connections may be illustratedor described in reference to being a single connection, a plurality ofconnections, unidirectional connections, or bidirectional connections.However, different embodiments may vary the implementation of theconnections. For example, separate unidirectional connections may beused rather than bidirectional connections and vice versa. Also,plurality of connections may be replaced with a single connection thattransfers multiple signals serially or in a time multiplexed manner.Likewise, single connections carrying multiple signals may be separatedout into various different connections carrying subsets of thesesignals. Therefore, many options exist for transferring signals.

Although specific conductivity types or polarity of potentials have beendescribed in the examples, it will be appreciated that conductivitytypes and polarities of potentials may be reversed.

Each signal described herein may be designed as positive or negativelogic. In the case of a negative logic signal, the signal is active lowwhere the logically true state corresponds to a logic level zero. In thecase of a positive logic signal, the signal is active high where thelogically true state corresponds to a logic level one. Note that any ofthe signals described herein can be designed as either negative orpositive logic signals. Therefore, in alternate embodiments, thosesignals described as positive logic signals may be implemented asnegative logic signals, and those signals described as negative logicsignals may be implemented as positive logic signals.

Furthermore, the terms ‘assert’ or ‘set’ and ‘negate’ (or ‘de-assert’ or‘clear’) are used herein when referring to the rendering of a signal,status bit, or similar apparatus into its logically true or logicallyfalse state, respectively. If the logically true state is a logic levelone, the logically false state is a logic level zero. And if thelogically true state is a logic level zero, the logically false state isa logic level one.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that the boundaries betweenlogic blocks are merely illustrative and that alternative embodimentsmay merge logic blocks or circuit elements or impose an alternatedecomposition of functionality upon various logic blocks or circuitelements. Thus, it is to be understood that the architectures depictedherein are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architecturescan be implemented which achieve the same functionality.

Any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality iseffectively ‘associated’ such that the desired functionality isachieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve aparticular functionality can be seen as ‘associated with’ each othersuch that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective ofarchitectures or intermediary components. Likewise, any two componentsso associated can also be viewed as being ‘operably connected,’ or‘operably coupled,’ to each other to achieve the desired functionality.

Furthermore, those skilled in the art will recognize that boundariesbetween the above described operations merely illustrative. The multipleoperations may be combined into a single operation, a single operationmay be distributed in additional operations and operations may beexecuted at least partially overlapping in time. Moreover, alternativeembodiments may include multiple instances of a particular operation,and the order of operations may be altered in various other embodiments.

Also for example, in one embodiment, the illustrated examples may beimplemented as circuitry located on a single integrated circuit orwithin a same device. Alternatively, the examples may be implemented asany number of separate integrated circuits or separate devicesinterconnected with each other in a suitable manner.

Also for example, the examples, or portions thereof, may implemented assoft or code representations of physical circuitry or of logicalrepresentations convertible into physical circuitry, such as in ahardware description language of any appropriate type.

Also, the invention is not limited to physical devices or unitsimplemented in non-programmable hardware but can also be applied inprogrammable devices or units able to perform the desired devicefunctions by operating in accordance with suitable program code, such asmainframes, minicomputers, servers, workstations, personal computers,notepads, personal digital assistants, electronic games, automotive andother embedded systems, cell phones and various other wireless devices,commonly denoted in this application as ‘computer systems’.

However, other modifications, variations and alternatives are alsopossible. The specifications and drawings are, accordingly, to beregarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense.

In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall notbe construed as limiting the claim. The word ‘comprising’ does notexclude the presence of other elements or steps then those listed in aclaim. Furthermore, the terms ‘a’ or ‘an,’ as used herein, are definedas one or more than one. Also, the use of introductory phrases such as‘at least one’ and ‘one or more’ in the claims should not be construedto imply that the introduction of another claim element by theindefinite articles ‘a’ or ‘an’ limits any particular claim containingsuch introduced claim element to inventions containing only one suchelement, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases ‘oneor more’ or ‘at least one’ and indefinite articles such as ‘a’ or ‘an.’The same holds true for the use of definite articles. Unless statedotherwise, terms such as ‘first’ and ‘second’ are used to arbitrarilydistinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these termsare not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or otherprioritization of such elements. The mere fact that certain measures arerecited in mutually different claims does not indicate that acombination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.

1. A method of calibrating a digitally controlled oscillator, (DCO) themethod comprising: configuring a fine tuning capacitive component of theDCO into a minimum capacitance configuration C₀ therefor; configuring acoarse tuning capacitive component of the DCO into a first configurationC_(i) therefor; determining a resulting first output frequency f_(i,0)of the DCO; configuring the coarse tuning capacitive component into asecond configuration C_(i−1) therefor, wherein the second and firstconfigurations of the coarse tuning capacitive component arecapacitively increasing consecutive configurations respectively;configuring the fine tuning capacitive component into a maximumcapacitance configuration C_(n) therefor; determining control signalsettings for a resolution adjustment component of the DCO that achieve aresulting output frequency f_(i−1,n) of the DCO equal to the determinedfirst output frequency f_(i,0); and generating calibration data for thesecond configuration C_(i−1) of the coarse tuning capacitive component,wherein the calibration data comprises the determined control signalsettings for the resolution adjustment component.
 2. The method of claim1, wherein the method comprises: configuring the fine tuning capacitivecomponent into the minimum capacitance configuration C₀ therefor; foreach configuration C_(i) of the coarse tuning capacitive componentdetermining a resulting first output frequency f_(i,0) of the DCO withthe fine tuning capacitive component configured in the minimumcapacitance configuration C₀ therefor; configuring the fine tuningcapacitive component into a maximum capacitance configuration C_(n)therefor; for each configuration C_(i−1) of the coarse tuning capacitivecomponent for which a capacitively increased configuration of the coarsetuning capacitive component exists, determining control signal settingsfor the resolution adjustment component that achieve a resulting outputfrequency f_(i−1,n) of the DCO equal to the determined first outputfrequency f_(i,0) for the capacitively increased consecutiveconfiguration C_(i) of the coarse tuning capacitive component; andgenerating calibration data for each configuration C_(i−1) of the coarsetuning capacitive component for which a capacitively increasedconfiguration of the coarse tuning capacitive component existscomprising the determined control signal settings for the resolutionadjustment component.
 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:determining control signal settings for a first and a second variablecapacitive component of the resolution adjustment component that achievea resulting output frequency fi−1,n of the DCO equal to the determinedfirst output frequency fi,0, wherein the resolution adjustment componentcomprises the first variable capacitive component coupled between afirst terminal of the fine tuning capacitive bank and a referencevoltage, and the second variable capacitive component coupled between asecond terminal of the fine tuning capacitive bank and the referencevoltage.
 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising storing thegenerated calibration data within a lookup table accessible by a decoderof the DCO.
 5. A digital synthesizer comprising a digitally controlledoscillator (DCO), the DCO comprising: a fine tuning capacitivecomponent; a coarse tuning capacitive component; a resolution adjustmentcomponent; and a calibration component arranged to calibrate the DCO,wherein said calibration comprises configuring the fine tuningcapacitive component of the DCO into a minimum capacitance configurationC₀ therefor, configuring the coarse tuning capacitive component of theDCO into a first configuration C_(i) therefor, determining a resultingfirst output frequency f_(i,0) of the DCO, configuring the coarse tuningcapacitive component into a second configuration C_(i−1), therefor,wherein the second and first configurations of the coarse tuningcapacitive component are capacitively increasing consecutiveconfigurations respectively, configuring the fine tuning capacitivecomponent into a maximum capacitance configuration C_(n) therefor,determining control signal settings for the resolution adjustmentcomponent of the DCO that achieve a resulting output frequency f_(i−1,n)of the DCO equal to the determined first output frequency f_(i,0); andgenerating calibration data for the second configuration C_(i−1) of thecoarse tuning capacitive component, wherein the calibration datacomprises the determined control signal settings for the resolutionadjustment component.
 6. The digital synthesizer of claim 5, wherein thecalibration component is arranged to perform calibration of the DCOcomprising: configuring the fine tuning capacitive component into theminimum capacitance configuration C₀ therefor; for each configurationC_(i) of the coarse tuning capacitive component determining a resultingfirst output frequency f_(i,0) of the DCO with the fine tuningcapacitive component configured in the minimum capacitance configurationC₀ therefor; configuring the fine tuning capacitive component into amaximum capacitance configuration C_(n) therefor; for each configurationC_(i−1) of the coarse tuning capacitive component for which acapacitively increased consecutive configuration of the coarse tuningcapacitive component exists, determining control signal settings for theresolution adjustment component that achieve a resulting outputfrequency f_(i−1,n) of the DCO equal to the determined first outputfrequency f_(i,0) for the capacitively increased consecutiveconfiguration of the coarse tuning capacitive component; and generatingcalibration data for each configuration C_(i−1) of the coarse tuningcapacitive component for which a capacitively increased consecutiveconfiguration of the coarse tuning capacitive component existscomprising the determined control signal settings for the resolutionadjustment component.
 7. The digital synthesizer of claim 5, wherein theresolution adjustment component comprises: a first variable capacitivecomponent coupled between a first terminal of the fine tuning capacitivebank and a reference voltage; and a second variable capacitive componentcoupled between a second terminal of the fine tuning capacitive bank andthe reference voltage, wherein the calibration component is arranged toperform calibration of the DCO further comprising determining controlsignal settings for the first and second variable capacitive componentsof the resolution adjustment component that achieve a resulting outputfrequency f_(i−1,n) of the DCO equal to the determined first outputfrequency f_(i,0).
 8. The digital synthesizer of claim 5 wherein the DCOfurther comprises: a decoder; and a lookup table accessible by thedecoder, wherein the calibration component is arranged to store thegenerated calibration data within the lookup table.
 9. The digitalsynthesizer of claim 5, wherein the digital synthesizer comprises adigital phase locked loop.
 10. A digitally controlled oscillator (DCO),comprising: a variable capacitance component coupled between a firstnode and a second node of the DCO, wherein the variable capacitancecomponent comprises a coarse tuning capacitive component coupled betweenthe first and second nodes of the DCO and configurable between aplurality of coarsely stepped capacitive configurations, a fine tuningcapacitive component coupled between the first and second nodes of theDCO and configurable between a plurality of finely stepped capacitiveconfigurations, and a resolution adjustment component comprising a firstvariable capacitive component coupled between a first terminal of thefine tuning capacitive component and a reference voltage and a secondvariable capacitive component coupled between a second terminal of thefine tuning capacitive component and the reference voltage; and adecoder arranged to receive a digital control word, determine controlsignal settings corresponding to the received digital control word,wherein the control signal settings comprise control signal settings fora first set of control signals for configuring the coarse tuningcapacitive component, control signal settings for a second set ofcontrol signals for configuring the fine tuning capacitive component,and control signal settings for a third set of control signals forconfiguring the variable capacitive components of the resolutionadjustment component, and apply the determined control signal settingsto the respective control signals to configure the variable capacitancecomponent.
 11. The DCO of claim 10, wherein the resolution adjustmentcomponent comprises: a first variable capacitive component coupledbetween a first terminal of the fine tuning capacitive component and areference voltage; and a second variable capacitive component coupledbetween a second terminal of the fine tuning capacitive component andthe reference voltage.